Connect with us


Gaza is facing a humanitarian crisis as Israel accused using white phosphorous bombs



Gaza is facing a humanitarian crisis as Israel accused using white phosphorous bombs


In the wake of Israel’s enforcement of a comprehensive blockade on Gaza as a response to a sudden offensive by Hamas, a grave humanitarian crisis is rapidly unfolding in the beleaguered region. Stranded residents find themselves grappling with a dearth of vital provisions, while the casualty count from the ongoing confrontations has surged past the grim milestone of 2,000.

Since the imposition of the complete siege on the besieged territory, the Gaza Strip has endured relentless airstrikes.

Israeli military fighter jets targeted over 200 sites during the night in a Gaza City neighborhood that was purportedly used by Hamas as a launching pad for their unprecedented onslaught. Under this “complete siege,” the Israeli defense ministry has suspended the supply of electricity, sustenance, potable water, and fuel to the enclave.

The Palestinian interior ministry reports that most of the targets have been “towers, residential edifices, civil and communal facilities, and numerous places of worship.” However, Hamas vehemently denies any involvement with the targeted towers.

According to the Gaza Health Ministry, the crowded coastal enclave has borne the tragic loss of a minimum of 900 lives, with 4,600 individuals sustaining injuries in the process. On a fateful Saturday, Hamas militants from the Gaza Strip launched a rampage through parts of southern Israel, marking the deadliest Palestinian assault in the annals of Israel’s history.

Israeli state broadcaster Kan revealed that the weekend’s death toll had surged to an alarming 1,200. Dozens of Israeli citizens and foreign nationals found themselves apprehended and taken into Gaza as captives, with some of them shamefully paraded through the streets on display via social media.

Hamas maintains that this ferocious attack was a direct response to Israeli transgressions within the highly contentious Al-Aqsa Masjid complex, located in occupied East Jerusalem, as well as a mounting wave of settler-driven violence. The situation remains fluid and fraught with tension as the world watches these tragic events unfold.

Gaza will become completely dark

Al Jazeera reported on Tuesday that the Government Media Office in Gaza issued a dire warning, stating that the Gaza Strip is on the brink of a looming humanitarian catastrophe. The perilous situation arises from the imminent complete shutdown of the power plant, which is expected within a matter of hours due to the exhaustion of its fuel reserves.

This impending power outage poses a severe threat, as it could cast the entire Strip into absolute darkness, rendering it nearly impossible to sustain the provision of essential life services. These vital services, all hinging on a supply of electricity, cannot be maintained even partially through the use of generators, given the restrictions on fuel shipments at the Rafah Gate.

The ramifications of this catastrophic situation reverberate across all strata of Gaza’s population, creating a dire humanitarian crisis. This crisis is further compounded by the relentless aggression from the occupying forces, resulting in the wanton destruction of entire residential neighborhoods through the use of hundreds of tons of explosives. Additionally, the deliberate targeting of citizens’ homes, effectively turning them into collateral damage, has been described as one of the most reprehensible instances of collective punishment against vulnerable civilians in recent history.

The international community is urged to respond swiftly to halt what is characterized as a crime against humanity, a multi-faceted act of mass murder. It is imperative to ensure the provision of essential means for life within the Gaza Strip and not to abandon its residents, who find themselves at the mercy of the oppressive tactics employed by the occupying forces.

Humanitarian crisis

United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres issued a grave warning on Monday, underscoring the already dire humanitarian situation in Gaza, which had been in a precarious state even before the outbreak of hostilities. He emphasized that the current conflict will only exacerbate the hardships exponentially.

Human Rights Watch (HRW) strongly criticized Israel’s decision to impose a comprehensive blockade on Gaza, deeming it a form of “collective punishment” and branding it as a “war crime.”

The World Food Programme added its voice to the growing concerns on Sunday, noting that while most shops in the territory maintain “one-month stocks of food,” the surge in demand due to fears of a prolonged conflict is rapidly depleting these reserves. Furthermore, frequent electricity cuts pose a significant risk of food spoilage.

For Nadine and her family, the situation remains incredibly dire. She revealed, “We have no water; it was cut off yesterday (Monday). We barely get electricity or internet, and we can’t leave the house to buy food as it’s getting more and more dangerous.” The sound of approaching aircraft sends them diving for cover, adding to the palpable fear and uncertainty that grips the region, as reported by CNN.

White phosphorus bombs

As the Israel-Hamas conflict entered its fifth day on Wednesday, Palestine has made a grave accusation, alleging that the Israeli military deployed white phosphorus bombs against civilians in the Karama neighborhood of the Gaza Strip.

In a statement released on X, formerly known as Twitter, the Palestinian Foreign Ministry asserted, “The Israeli occupation is employing internationally prohibited white phosphorus bombs against the Palestinian population in the Karama neighborhood in northern Gaza.” This accusation adds a concerning dimension to the ongoing hostilities in the region.


Rami Abdo, the founder of the European Observatory for Human Rights, shared a video clip on the X platform, alleging that it depicted the Israeli military’s use of white phosphorus munitions. In his message, he claimed, “Israeli military forces are employing toxic white phosphorus [bombs] in densely populated areas to the northwest of Gaza City.” This video further fuels concerns about the tactics employed in the ongoing conflict.

According to Anadolu, the New York-based human rights organization Human Rights Watch had previously referenced reports of Israel’s use of white phosphorus bombs in Gaza during previous conflicts. It’s worth noting that the use of white phosphorus weapons for creating a smokescreen and concealing troop movements is generally accepted under international law. However, the 1980 Geneva Convention explicitly prohibits its use in densely populated areas, raising questions about the legality of its deployment in this context.

Israel has not yet provided a response to the claim regarding the use of white phosphorus bombs.

The Israeli military has reported that dozens of its fighter jets conducted strikes on over 200 targets during the overnight hours in a Gaza City neighborhood, asserting that these locations were being used by Hamas for launching their unprecedented offensive.

Tragically, the Gaza Strip’s health ministry has confirmed a substantial toll, with at least 900 lives lost and 4,600 individuals sustaining injuries in this densely populated coastal enclave.

Over the weekend, Hamas militants from the Gaza Strip carried out a devastating incursion into parts of southern Israel, marking the deadliest attack in the history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The Israeli death toll has risen to 1,200, as reported by an Israeli military spokesperson.

Regrettably, the majority of the victims have been civilians, many of whom were caught in their homes, on the streets, or even at an outdoor dance gathering. The situation has taken a dire turn with scores of Israelis and foreigners being taken captive and transferred to Gaza, where some have been publicly paraded through the streets, as documented on social media.

Hamas maintains that this attack was in response to what it perceives as Israeli transgressions at the highly contentious Al-Aqsa Mosque complex in occupied East Jerusalem and the escalation of settler-driven violence. The situation remains fraught with tension, and the international community watches closely as the crisis unfolds.

More than 260,000 people displaced in Gaza

The Gaza Strip has witnessed a staggering exodus of over 260,000 people, compelled to flee their homes due to the relentless Israeli bombardments delivered from the air, land, and sea. This grim revelation was reported by the United Nations, with the UN humanitarian agency OCHA providing an update on Tuesday. They caution that this number is anticipated to rise further, amplifying the magnitude of the humanitarian crisis.

It’s worth noting that around 3,000 individuals had already been displaced before the escalation of hostilities on Saturday. The ongoing bombing campaign has left destruction in its wake, with more than 1,000 housing units demolished, and an additional 560 units rendered uninhabitable, as reported by Palestinian authorities and cited by OCHA.

Of the displaced population, nearly 175,500 individuals have sought refuge in 88 schools administered by the UN agency that supports Palestinian refugees, UNRWA. Another 14,500 people have found shelter in government schools, and approximately 74,000 are estimated to be staying with friends, family, or seeking safety in churches and other facilities.

This staggering number of displaced individuals inside Gaza now stands as the highest recorded since the 50-day escalation of hostilities in 2014, underscoring the gravity of the current situation.

OCHA also raises a crucial concern, pointing out that for those who have not been displaced, meeting their basic needs is becoming increasingly challenging. Furthermore, Israel’s imposition of a “complete siege” on the already blockaded Gaza Strip, including the cutoff of vital supplies like food, water, fuel, and electricity, has been widely criticized. UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has warned that this move is exacerbating the already dire humanitarian circumstances in the region.

Airstrike on the home of the Hamas commander

Israeli media outlets have reported that the Israeli military executed an airstrike on the residence of relatives of Mohammad Deif, the Hamas military commander. This strike occurred in the Qizan an Najjar neighborhood situated in Khan Younis, a southern city within the Gaza Strip.

Palestinian reports confirm that Deif’s father, brother, his son, and the brother’s granddaughter tragically lost their lives in the course of this attack. According to Al Mayadeen, an undetermined number of relatives were present in the residence at the time and have now become trapped under the debris, further underscoring the grave toll of the ongoing conflict.

14 Americans killed

In a speech delivered on Tuesday, President Biden confirmed that at least 14 Americans have tragically lost their lives, and there are others who remain unaccounted for amidst the ongoing conflict.

As part of efforts to deter an escalation of the conflict, the United States has deployed an aircraft carrier and other warships to the eastern Mediterranean. In addition to this show of force, the U.S. is providing various forms of assistance, including intelligence sharing with Israel.

Relatives of Americans believed to be held in Gaza are fervently calling on the Biden administration to secure their safe return home.

The repercussions of the conflict have reverberated far beyond the immediate region, with Western powers and numerous other nations reporting their citizens as killed, abducted, or missing. These nations include Brazil, Cambodia, Canada, Ireland, Mexico, Nepal, Panama, Paraguay, Russia, Sri Lanka, Thailand, and Ukraine.

Hamas is holding approximately 150 captives since its ground incursion, a group comprising children, the elderly, and young people who were captured during a music festival where around 270 individuals tragically lost their lives.

On Monday, Hamas issued a warning that it would begin executing hostages each time Israel launches an attack on a civilian target in Gaza without warning. French President Emmanuel Macron strongly condemned this threat, labeling it as “unacceptable blackmail.”

The 2.3 million Palestinians residing in the beleaguered coastal territory have been living in an environment marred by fear and chaos, as it continues to endure the onslaught of thousands of Israeli munitions.

Hamas reported that the Israeli strikes claimed the lives of two of its senior figures: Zakaria Muammar, who led its economics section, and Jawad Abu Shamala, who was responsible for coordinating ties with other Palestinian factions.

Tragically, four Palestinian journalists were also killed in Israeli airstrikes on Gaza City, as reported by media unions and officials.

The EU opposes a complete siege

On Monday, Israel imposed a comprehensive blockade on Gaza, a territory it has already been blockading for years. This new move includes cutting off essential supplies such as water, food, electricity, and other necessities, further exacerbating the already dire humanitarian situation.

European Union foreign ministers have collectively called on Israel to refrain from cutting off these essential provisions and have urged the establishment of humanitarian corridors to aid those attempting to escape the conflict.

UN Human Rights Chief Volker Turk pointed out that such sieges are explicitly prohibited under international humanitarian law. The situation on the ground is growing increasingly dire, with medical supplies, including oxygen, running perilously low at Gaza’s overwhelmed Al-Shifa hospital, as reported by Dr. Mohammed Ghonim, who works in the emergency room.

Israel was shocked from surprise attack

Israel is grappling with the aftermath of an unprecedented ground, air, and sea assault by Hamas, which commenced with a barrage of thousands of rockets. Some have likened the scale of this attack to the impact of the 9/11 attacks on the United States.

In the wake of the assault, soldiers stationed along the high-tech security barrier surrounding Gaza have shared their accounts, explaining how the attack began with an attempt to disable observation cameras and communication systems. Many soldiers admitted that they were caught off guard and unprepared for the scale of the assault.

Israel is now confronted with the looming threat of a multi-front war, as clashes with militants on the northern border with Lebanon persisted for three days. Notably, for the first time since the Hamas attack, there was an exchange of fire between Israel and forces in Syria, initiated after Israel’s military reported the firing of munitions toward the Golan Heights, an area occupied by Israel since 1967.

Mourning and anger prevail in the southern Lebanese village of Khirbet Selm, where mourners carried the caskets of two fighters draped in yellow Hezbollah flags. These fighters were reportedly killed in Israeli strikes the previous day. Additionally, the Iran-backed Hezbollah movement reported a third fighter killed in the conflict.

On Tuesday, the Ezzedine al-Qassam Brigades claimed responsibility for a fresh salvo of rocket fire from southern Lebanon towards Israel. The Israeli army confirmed it had responded with artillery fire. The situation on the ground is being described by some as resembling a state of war.

Unrest has also surged in the West Bank, where 15 Palestinians have tragically lost their lives since the conflict began on Saturday.

In light of these events, Prime Minister Netanyahu has called for an “emergency government of national unity.” This call comes after his administration’s proposal for judicial reforms divided the nation earlier this year, but the conflict has since brought the nation closer together.


Will the Israel-Gaza conflict affect Joe Biden’s chances of re-election?



Will the Israel-Gaza conflict affect Joe Biden’s chances of re-election
Creator: Cameron Smith | Credit: White House

When major issues in American foreign policy intersect with election periods, they often spell trouble for the incumbent president. Like several predecessors, US President Joe Biden is dealing with significant challenges like Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, some of which were inherited from previous governments, including the withdrawal from Afghanistan. Others, like the Israeli retaliation in Gaza and Iran’s involvement, involve complexities from both current and past administrations. With these significant crises converging during a tense election season, it’s understandable that Biden’s foreign policy is under close examination. Thus, it raises the question of how this administration’s foreign policy might affect voter decisions in the upcoming November elections.

Back to Afghanistan

Many observers believe that President Biden’s foreign policy difficulties began with what has often been labeled the “botched” American exit from Afghanistan. Although this event alone, despite the severe yet preventable consequences that ensued, is unlikely to significantly affect electoral outcomes beyond the concerns raised by some commentators. However, this might not hold true for other global crises currently confronting the Biden administration, particularly its handling of the situation in Gaza. Predicting voter behavior is notoriously challenging, especially well ahead of election day. Yet, examining how international crises have historically influenced voter intentions can shed light on how Americans perceive their global role and the potential impact this perception could have on their selection of a leader in the upcoming election.

Read More: Biden tells Netanyahu that the US will not take part in a counter-strike against Iran

1968 redux?

This year, the Democratic National Convention is set to take place in Chicago, Illinois, echoing the unsettling similarities to the year 1968 when it was last hosted there. That year, amidst a turbulent political climate driven by foreign policy crises, the convention was marked by significant discord.

In 1968, America was grappling with the aftermath of the assassinations of Martin Luther King Jr. and presidential hopeful Robert F. Kennedy, intense civil rights turmoil, and the deepening conflict in Vietnam. As the Democratic Party convened in Chicago, it faced a profound crisis. The convention was met with large-scale anti-war demonstrations against U.S. involvement in Vietnam, which culminated in violent clashes with police, resulting in the arrest of 650 protesters.

The chaos at the convention contributed to the Democratic nominee, Vice President Hubert Humphrey, losing the presidential election to Richard Nixon.

Today, while the geopolitical context with the Middle East differs significantly from Vietnam, domestically, the Democratic Party shows similar signs of division, particularly over the Biden administration’s approach to Gaza. During the Michigan state primary in February, over 100,000 Democrats cast “uncommitted” votes in a coordinated effort to push President Biden to take stronger action against the violence in Gaza. This is noteworthy considering Biden’s narrow victory in Michigan by just over 150,000 votes in the 2020 election.

As the convention approaches in August, ongoing peaceful protests at Democratic events are expected to persist, reflecting vital democratic dissent. However, media portrayal of these protests is likely to focus on internal party conflicts, potentially affecting public perceptions of President Biden’s leadership and the overall unity of the party.


Iran has significantly influenced past U.S. elections, and recent events suggest it might do so again. The 1979 Iranian Revolution and the mishandled Iranian hostage crisis are widely considered to have contributed to one of the most significant defeats in modern American political history for then-incumbent Democratic President Jimmy Carter.

In the midst of the Iranian Revolution, a year before the 1980 election, militant students stormed the American embassy in Tehran, taking over 50 Americans hostage. The crisis, which lasted more than a year, unfolded under the watch of seemingly powerless American officials, and a failed military rescue attempt only added to the debacle.

The revolution, alongside the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in December 1979, severely undermined Carter’s authority. His Republican opponent, Ronald Reagan, capitalized on Carter’s perceived weaknesses, campaigning on a promise to “make America great again.”

Carter ultimately lost the election in a landslide, similar to Humphrey in 1968. Notably, the hostages were released on the day of Reagan’s inauguration, a timing many believe was not coincidental. Despite conventional narratives of Carter’s weakness, it’s important to recognize that after the failed rescue, his administration undertook lengthy and tense negotiations with Iran, continuing right up until the end of his term. These negotiations eventually culminated in the hostages’ release. There remain substantial questions about the Reagan campaign’s involvement in the resolution of this crisis.

Perceptions matter

The historical specifics of foreign policy crises hold importance, but their perceptions and the narratives around them often have a greater impact on election outcomes. During his presidency, Jimmy Carter was perceived as ineffectual, contributing to a broader sense of American “malaise,” while Ronald Reagan presented himself as a figure of strength and vitality, ultimately leading to Carter’s electoral defeat. Similarly, that loss profoundly influenced the United States’ global role and the course of history.

Following four years of tumult under Donald Trump, Joe Biden sought to reestablish America as a positive global force, assuring Americans that the “beacon” of U.S. leadership could be reignited. However, there’s a risk that Biden’s own foreign policy could weaken this message and his personal appeal. Current polling indicates that around two-thirds of Americans favor an immediate ceasefire in Gaza. Yet, Biden’s seeming inability and unwillingness to separate the U.S. from Israeli actions, coupled with his administration’s ongoing support without conditions on military aid, are fracturing the diverse voting coalition that helped him ascend to power. Maintaining this coalition and ensuring voter turnout are crucial for his re-election prospects.

Moreover, perceptions of Biden’s apparent lack of empathy toward the suffering of Palestinian people, especially children, could severely damage the compassionate image he meticulously crafted—a key element of his 2020 voter appeal. This situation places Biden in a double bind. On one hand, he is seen as overseeing a crisis in American moral leadership, with many believing the “international rules-based order” he vowed to uphold is being applied inconsistently, especially to U.S. allies. On the other hand, Donald Trump, once again his opponent, aims to capitalize on perceived weaknesses by projecting an image of decisive strength, appealing to a vision of America regaining unmatched global dominance, reminiscent of Reagan’s rhetoric.

This perception that Biden’s administration is stumbling through one foreign policy crisis after another only strengthens this narrative. Additionally, there are concerns that his foreign policy team is more focused on tallying “wins” and “losses” rather than addressing the deep-seated, structural issues behind these crises. Whether fair or not, combined with other factors like changing perceptions of the domestic economy, these issues contribute to a notably low approval rating for Biden.

In a closely contested race, where polling shows a margin of error that could swing either way, these perceptions become even more critical. As history shows, the mythologizing of these perceptions can significantly influence election outcomes.

Read More: Poll Indicates Majority of Voters Consider Trump’s Hush Money Case Serious

Continue Reading


Poll Indicates Majority of Voters Consider Trump’s Hush Money Case Serious



Poll Indicates Majority of Voters Consider Trump's Hush Money Case Serious
Get this image on: Flickr | Creator: PO1/USN | Credit: Dominique A. Pineiro

Ahead of the upcoming trial of the former president set to commence next week in New York, a recent Reuters/Ipsos poll indicates that the majority of American voters consider the criminal accusations against Donald Trump, involving purportedly concealing secret payments to a porn star, to be significant.

According to the poll, conducted over five days and concluded on Monday, approximately 64% of registered voters view the allegations as at least “somewhat serious,” while 34% regard them as less important.

The trial, slated to commence next Monday, marks the first of four criminal charges against Trump, who ran as the Republican candidate against Democratic President Joe Biden in the November election.

Legal analysts suggest that the remaining three cases, which involve allegations of election fraud or mishandling of classified documents, are notably more grave compared to the hush money payment allegations.

The Reuters/Ipsos poll indicates that any potential criminal conviction could carry significant repercussions for Trump, who finds himself in a closely contested race with Biden. Trump stands as the first sitting or former US president to confront criminal charges.

Approximately four out of ten Republican respondents perceive the hush money allegations as serious, along with two-thirds of independents. New York prosecutors allege that Trump concealed a $130,000 payment facilitated by his former lawyer, Michael Cohen, to porn star Stormy Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford, in exchange for her silence regarding a purported sexual encounter with Trump a decade prior.

Also Read: The Top Candidates for Trump’s Vice Presidential Nominee Are These

rump refuted the existence of such a meeting and pleaded not guilty. Nearly one-third of Republicans and almost two-thirds of independents surveyed find it plausible that Trump falsified business records and engaged in fraud.

Trump has entered a plea of not guilty to 34 counts of falsifying business records; notably, he has not been specifically indicted for racketeering, which constitutes a distinct offense under New York law.

Voters seem to regard the charges against Trump in the ongoing trials as more severe. Approximately 74% of registered voters surveyed deem allegations of voter fraud to be serious. Trump endeavors to postpone all four trials.

However, a New York state appellate judge rejected his plea to postpone the undisclosed trial. Around 60% of registered voters in the survey express agreement with the assertion that Trump’s criminal trials should proceed before the November 5 election.

Respondents displayed ambivalence towards this claim, with only 27% of registered voters agreeing with Trump’s argument that presidents should be immune unless they have been impeached by Congress.

Many Republicans shared this perspective, with approximately four-fifths of respondents agreeing that the prosecutions were “excessive and politically motivated.” However, around a quarter of Republican respondents in the poll indicated that they would not support Trump if he were convicted of a felony crime by a jury.

About three-quarters of registered voters in the Reuters/Ipsos poll expressed the view that having a president in office with such significant legal obligations would be “risky.” The survey, conducted online from April 4-8, encompassed 1,021 U.S. adults, including 833 registered voters, nationwide.

More: Trump Media 18% Stock closed down more after filing plans to issue more DJT stock

Continue Reading


The Top Candidates for Trump’s Vice Presidential Nominee Are These



The Top Candidates for Trump's Vice Presidential Nominee Are These

The primary season for the presidency is finished, and now that former President Donald Trump has secured the Republican nomination, inquiries are arising about who is being considered for his vice presidential shortlist.

Back in February, during the ongoing primaries, Trump mentioned to Maria Bartiromo of Fox News that he didn’t plan on revealing his selection anytime soon.

Insiders connected to Trump’s campaign suggested that Trump hold off on announcing his choice until the convention to build anticipation and bolster his sway over the contenders vying for the position.

Reports from CBS News indicate that Trump is contemplating Stefanik as a potential candidate for vice president. When Stefanik was asked if she would accept the role of vice president, she responded on NBC News’ “Meet the Press” saying she would be pleased to serve in any capacity within the Trump administration.

He ended his campaign for the presidency in November and threw his support behind Trump just before the New Hampshire primary, dealing a blow to his fellow South Carolinian and former governor.

Scott stated on “CBS Mornings” that he would never seek a cabinet position from Trump but refused to answer whether he would serve as Trump’s vice president.

Originally hailing from the Republican stronghold of South Dakota, Noem contemplated a presidential bid in 2024 but ultimately opted against it upon Trump’s announcement of his candidacy. “And if President Trump runs, I’ll support him,” Noem told CBS News Major Garrett in 2022.

Noem was among the earliest governors to endorse Trump, declaring her support at a rally last September, and she actively campaigned for him several times in Iowa ahead of the January caucuses.

North Dakota Governor Doug Burgum, another former candidate for the 2024 presidential race, has also been mentioned by the Trump campaign as a possible vice presidential pick.

Burgum was the initial former 2024 presidential contender to formally endorse Trump, appearing alongside him at a rally in Indianola, Iowa, on January 1, 2024.

“He’s one of the finest governors in our nation, and I’m eager to have him join the administration, playing a crucial role,” Trump remarked about Burgum during the January 14 protest.

Last year, Sanders delivered the Republican rebuttal to President Biden’s State of the Union address. She formally endorsed Trump at a campaign rally in Hialeah, Florida, in November 2023.

Carson, who competed against Trump in the 2016 presidential primary, campaigned for the former president in Iowa prior to the caucuses. Carson is seen as a reliable choice for vice president due to his popularity among conservatives and Christians.

When asked if he and Trump had discussed the possibility of Carson becoming vice president, Carson replied, “I don’t want to talk about private conversations.”

Rubio endorsed Trump the day before the Iowa caucuses in a piece published on March 21. In an interview with Glenn Beck, Rubio stated that he had not communicated with Trump or his campaign regarding a potential vice-presidential candidacy.

“The reason I serve in public office and the motivation behind my candidacy, which involves a six-year commitment upon taking office, is because I’ve always aimed to contribute to the betterment of our country,” Rubio remarked.

More: Republican official cautions that Joe Biden might face removal from the general election ballot in Ohio

Continue Reading